2017 – The Year of New World Order Anniversaries

Makia Freeman, Contributor
Waking Times

New World Order Anniversaries abound in this year of 2017. If you go back in time exactly 50 or exactly 100 years, there are key events that occurred that still shape our world today – events orchestrated by the same network of Secret Societies and Illuminati bloodlines that have been manipulating the world for hundreds if not thousands of years. The following article highlights 5 New World Order anniversaries about which it is important to inform yourself, since the official version of these events is shallow at best and deceptive at worst. In all cases, the events were not what they seemed at the time, nor were we ever told the full truth afterwards by governments or the mainstream media.

The RMS Lusitania at the end of a voyage in New York. The sinking of this ship is a major event that led towards the US entering WWI, 2 years later in 1917. Image credit: Wikipedia.

New World Order Anniversaries #1: 100 Years Since US Tricked into Entering WW1

The US Government of 1917 under Woodrow Wilson tried to paint a picture that it was highly reluctant to enter the War in Europe that became known as World War I (the so-called “War to End All Wars”). At one point perhaps that was true. However, since the agents of deception had infiltrated the White House – such as Colonel Edward Mandell House, handler of then US president Wilson – the US was being manipulated to enter the war on the side of the Triple Entente (Britain, France and Russia). The social engineers knew, though, that they couldn’t simply announce that the US would enter the war. It would be political suicide, go against Wilson’s campaign promises and cross public opinion.

Besides, that’s not how things work. The NWO manipulators use the Freemasonic technique of ordo ab chao or order out of chaos to move their agenda forward by stealth. Just as with the false flag Pearl Harbor incident that would get the US into a later world war in 1941, they needed an excuse by which they could claim they were defending themselves. The British ship RMS Lusitania provided such as excuse, because it was carrying American passengers. The cruiser, which left New York and was bound for Britain, was hiding British armaments and was attacked by German U-Boats and sunk on May 7, 1915. For the well-researched background to the false flag Lusitania event, see the article FALSE FLAG AT SEA – The Lusitania, Woodrow Wilson, and the Deceptions that Dragged America into World War I by James Perloff.

Germany had foreknowledge of the Lusitania event and even warned Americans they could be attacked.

Germany knew they were being coaxed into war. They even took out an ad (see image above) that was published in 50 US newspapers, warning Americans who were going to be aboard the Lusitania that they were entering a war zone and thus could be attacked. Perloff writes:

“On May 5 – two days before the tragedy – Winston Churchill met with Admiral Fisher (First Sea Lord), Admiral Oliver (Chief of Naval Staff), and Commander Joseph Kenworthy (Naval Intelligence), in the Admiralty’s map room. Here a great grid showed locations of British ships and hostile ships, marked with pins. The map showed the Lusitania and U-20 on a collision course. What was said is unrecorded, but Kenworthy wrote in his postwar book The Freedom of the Seas: “The Lusitania was deliberately sent at considerably reduced speed into an area where a U-boat was known to be waiting and with her escorts withdrawn.” However, the publisher deleted the word “deliberately” at the Admiralty’s insistence.

The Admiralty could have safeguarded the Lusitania by rerouting her around the north of Ireland, where it knew no U-boats were operating … On May 7, however, no destroyers were designated to protect her, even though four were lying idle in the nearby port of Milford Haven, and despite the U-20’s known presence in the south Irish Sea, where it had sunk two steamers the previous day. The only warship assigned to meet the Lusitania was an aging cruiser, the Juno. However, even the Juno was ordered back to the port of Queenstown on Ireland’s southern coast – on the justification that she was vulnerable to submarine attack!”

Like most of these events, the perpetrators were in charge of the subsequent investigation, commission and coverup:

“Thus, in violation of the traditions of justice, Lord Mersey was asked to render a verdict before the inquiry even began. The request came from the men responsible for denying the Lusitania protection.

Comparison to Pearl Harbor is apt. In that event, President Franklin D. Roosevelt and select officials had complete foreknowledge of the attack, which they denied to the commanders in Hawaii, Admiral Kimmel and General Short. Roosevelt then appointed an investigative body, the Roberts Commission, which laid all blame on Kimmel and Short. Roosevelt thus followed the example set 26 years earlier by his distant cousin Churchill. It bears mentioning that when the Lusitania sank, Franklin D. Roosevelt was Assistant Secretary of the Navy, the same position held by another of his cousins, Theodore Roosevelt, when the USS Maine exploded in 1898, triggering the Spanish-American War.”

The sinking of Lusitania, in 1915, was not in and of itself enough for the warmongering international bankers to get the US into the war. They got their pretext 2 years later, in 1917, with the Zimmerman telegram:

“Once reelected, Wilson shed the “peace” pretenses, and again sought justification for war. After Germany – pressing for victory to end the gruesome conflict ­– announced resumption of unrestricted submarine warfare, Wilson terminated relations, claiming Germany had broken its pledge. (He ignored that the pledge had been conditionalon Britain’s reciprocal observance of international law, something the British government never did.) But Wilson still needed another provocation to push the war button …

Arthur Zimmerman … was Germany’s foreign secretary. In January 1917 he had cabled the German ambassador in Mexico, instructing him that, if the U.S. entered the war, Germany should propose a military alliance with Mexico … Such proposals were actually “par for the course” in the international deal-making of World War I. For example, Britain had brought Italy into the war as an ally by promising the Italians new territories. The Mexicans considered the German proposal quite unrealistic. Nonetheless, when Wilson released the Zimmerman telegram to the wire services, it was used to renew “German invasion hysteria.”

On April 2, Wilson convened Congress and requested a declaration of war, which came four days later. Despite the orchestrated media furor, most Americans still opposed war, but the financial powers had lined up both parties’ machines; only a handful of courageous senators and congressmen opposed the declaration.” 

A major event in the list of New World Order anniversaries: the Balfour Declaration, justification for Zionists to found Israel.

Another key event also occurred in 1917 which, as the last 100 years have shown, has had severe and deadly geopolitical repercussions. I refer to the infamous Balfour Declaration, an important milestone in New World Order anniversaries. The Balfour Declaration was a letter addressed by Arthur James Balfour (then British Foreign Minister) to Walter Rothschild. The letter is dated November 2nd, 1917, and was the result of decades of pressure by the Zionists, who had formed their first conference (“The World Zionist Congress”) in 1897 in Basel, Switzerland. Unfortunately for the people already living in that land – the Palestinians – the letter has been used by the Zionists to justify the founding of Israel (by force), which eventually happened on May 14th, 1948. The UK was occupying Palestine at the time so had no lawful right to grant the territory to anyone, since they stole it themselves, so the letter is hardly a binding legal document.

Arthur Koestler is a Jewish author who exposed the myth of “Jewish DNA” and a Jewish claim to Palestine in his 1976 book The Thirteenth Tribe. In that book he outlines why Ashkenazi Jews are not descended from the historical Israelites of antiquity, but rather from Khazars (a Turkic people from Khazaria which is now in Russia). He theorizes that the Khazars (who converted to Judaism in the 8th century AD) migrated westwards into Eastern Europe in the 12th and 13th centuries when the Khazar Empire was collapsing. Koestler wrote that in the Balfour Declaration, “one nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third.” Well put.

Additionally, the letter states that the UK would support the Zionists establishing a Jewish homeland if nothing was done to the detriment of the civil and religious rights of Palestinians living there. Anyone who knows about Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians – e.g. rationing their food, shooting unarmed Arab civilians including children, building illegal settlements on stolen land, testing new weapons against them in the Gaza strip (an open air concentration camp) and committing genocide – will know that the Zionists have hardly respected that. Here is an excerpt from the Balfour Declaration:

“His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

The Balfour Declaration didn’t just occur by chance. It was pushed forward by Zionist powerbrokers and sympathizers who held sway over both the UK and US Governments at the time. There is considerable evidence that the UK signed off on the Jewish homeland as part of a backroom deal – so they could get the US to enter WW1 on their side. Remember, numerous members of the same group of international bankers (many Jewish) were pushing for Zionism and had the power to fund either the UK/Triple Entente OR Germany/Triple Alliance, and thus decide the outcome of the war by whom they choose to fund more heavily.

The article Behind the Balfour Declaration – Britain’s Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild at the Institute for Historical Review quotes several key figures who have admitted that the Balfour Declaration was part of deal where US entry into WW1 was the dangling carrot in front of the UK donkey:

“As I have already said, I had a part in initiating the negotiations in the early autumn of 1916 between the British and French Governments and the Zionist leaders, which led to the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate for Palestine. The first object, of course, was to enlist the very considerable and necessary influence of the Jews, and especially of the Zionist or Nationalist Jews, to help us bring America into the War at the most critical period of the hostilities. This was publicly acknowledged by Mr. Lloyd George during a recent debate in the House of Commons.” – James Malcolm, who worked with Mark Sykes, one of the writers of the Sykes-Picot Agreement

” … the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the war was to secure the cooperation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilize the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis. Thus, as will be seen, the Zionists having carried out their part, and greatly helped to bring America in, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was but the public confirmation of the necessarily secret “gentlemens’ ” agreement of 1916, made with the previous knowledge, acquiescence, and or approval of the Arabs, and of the British, and of the French and other Allied governments, and not merely a voluntary, altruistic and romantic gesture on the part of Great Britain as certain people either through pardonable ignorance assume or unpardonable ill-will would represent or rather misrepresent …” – Samuel Landman, secretary to the Zionist leaders Weizmann and Sokolow, and later secretary of the World Zionist Organization

“There is no better proof of the value of the Balfour Declaration as a military move than the fact that Germany entered into negotiations with Turkey in an endeavor to provide an alternative scheme which would appeal to Zionists … It was believed that if Great Britain declared for the fulfillment of Zionist aspirations in Palestine under her own pledge, one effect would be to bring Russian Jewry to the cause of the Entente.

It was believed, also, that such a declaration would have a potent influence upon world Jewry outside Russia, and secure for the Entente the aid of Jewish financial interests. In America, their aid in this respect would have a special value when the Allies had almost exhausted the gold and marketable securities available for American purchases. Such were the chief considerations which, in 1917, impelled the British Government towards making a contract with Jewry.” – Lloyd George, UK Prime Minister 1916-1922

It is entirely appropriate that the Balfour Declaration is addressed to a Rothschild, since the Rothschild family remains the most powerful, wealthy and influential family in the New World Order network of bloodlines and secret societies. Despite all of this, we are not yet finished with 1917, for it was also the year of the Russian (i.e. Jewish Communist) Revolution, which will be continued in part 2 of the New World Order anniversaries.

About the Author

Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com (FaceBook here), writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance

**Sources embedded throughout article.

Like Waking Times on Facebook. Follow Waking Times on Twitter.

This article (2017 – The Year of New World Order Anniversaries) was originally created and published by The Freedom Articles and is re-posted here with permission.